spot_img
8.4 C
London
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
spot_img

Summon Lee Jae-myung D-2…

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

On the 26th, two days before the day when the prosecution notified the Democratic Party representative Lee Jae-myung to respond to the summons investigation in connection with the suspicion of ‘Sungnam FC donation’, the Democratic Party’s internal opinion seems to be divided over whether to attend the prosecution.

Negative opinions prevailed among the ‘pro-Lee Jae-myeong’ (pro-name) faction that they could not respond to the prosecution’s investigation for oppression of the opposition party, while the ‘non-Lee Jae-myung’ (scream) faction pointed out that the risk to the party should be reduced by proudly going to the investigation did.

Representative Lee is known to have discussed this issue with the leadership and former lawmakers on this day as well.

So far, it seems likely that he will not comply with the summons investigation on the 28th.

Representative Lee’s side claims that it is physically impossible to attend on the day suggested by the prosecution.

Representative Lee said in a phone call, “There is a plenary session of the National Assembly on the 28th, and a visit to Gwangju is scheduled.”

He then openly expressed his dissatisfaction with the prosecution, saying, “The fact that he unilaterally notified the date even though he knew that it would be difficult for him to attend was Lee’s intention to ‘frame’ him to refuse to comply with the investigation.”

In addition to the existing argument that the investigation targeting Lee was biased and unfair, key party members launched a massive counterattack against the prosecution that day.

Rep. Park Beom-gye said on SBS Radio’s ‘Kim Tae-hyun’s Political Show’ that the  investigation into the suspicion of ‘Deutsch Motors stock price manipulation’ by Mrs. Kim Gun-hee, wife of President Yoon Seok-yeol, was relatively insufficient, saying, “The prosecution of the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye governments pretended to, but this government is not like that.” criticized.

Floor leader Park Hong-geun added to the counterattack at the Supreme Council meeting, saying, “If Prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol’s ‘seeking living power’ continues, the special prosecutor will have no choice but to reveal the truth clearly.”

On the other hand, the non- Lee’s sides urged Lee to respond to the investigation.

Regarding the party’s prosecution dictatorship and political suppression countermeasures committee, which criticized the people’s power as’coordinate taking’ in a statement on the day, “When political prosecutors announce their achievements, names and photos are information to be widely disclosed, and they are in trouble with a’fabricated investigation’. He refuted, saying, “Is it ‘taking the coordinates’ that should not be disclosed when crowded?”

At the same time, he raised his voice, saying, “To guarantee the basic rights of the people, more information related to prosecutors must be disclosed.”

However, he emphasized that he “expresses regret” for the fact that a picture of a prosecutor disclosed by Park was erroneously inserted and circulated online, but emphasized that “we will disclose the information of prosecutors more carefully in the future.” <Yunap>

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
Latest news
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
Related news
- Advertisement -spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here